4.8 Article

Design of a Pd-Au Nitrite Reduction Catalyst by Identifying and Optimizing Active Ensembles

期刊

ACS CATALYSIS
卷 9, 期 9, 页码 7957-7966

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.9b02182

关键词

nitrite reduction; density functional theory; catalyst design; ensemble effect; metal-on-metal structure

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1764230]
  2. Welch Foundation [F-1841]
  3. NSF Nanosystems Engineering Research Center for Nanotechnology-Enabled Water Treatment [ERC-1449500]
  4. China Scholarship Council
  5. 2017 Hamilton/Schoch Fellowship
  6. 2018 Department Excellence Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nitrate (NO3-) is a ubiquitous contaminant in groundwater that causes serious public health issues around the world. Though various strategies are able to reduce NO3- to nitrite (NO2-), a rational catalyst design strategy for NO2- removal has not been found, in part because of the complicated reaction network of nitrate chemistry. In this study, we show, through catalytic modeling with density functional theory (DFT) calculations, that the performance of mono- and bimetallic surfaces for nitrite reduction can be rapidly screened using N, N-2, and NH3 binding energies as reactivity descriptors. With a number of active surface atomic ensembles identified for nitrite reduction, we have designed a series of metal-on-metal bimetallics with optimized surface reactivity and a maximum number of active sites. Choosing Pd-on-Au nanoparticles (NPs) as candidate catalysts, both theory and experiment find that a thin monolayer of Pd-on-Au NPs (size: similar to 4 nm) leads to high nitrite reduction performance, outperforming pure Pd NPs and the other Pd surface compositions considered. Experiments show that this thin layer of Pd-on-Au has a relatively high selectivity for N-2 formation, compared to pure Pd NPs. More importantly, our study shows that a simple model, based upon DFT-calculated thermodynamic energies, can facilitate catalysts design relevant to environmental issues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据