4.4 Article

Comparison of urine and blood NGAL for early prediction of delayed graft function in adult kidney transplant recipients: a meta-analysis of observational studies

期刊

BMC NEPHROLOGY
卷 20, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12882-019-1491-y

关键词

Kidney transplantation; Delayed graft function; NGAL; Predictive biomarker

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81771714, 81571561]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Neutrophil gelatinase-assoicated lipocalin (NGAL) appears to be a promising proximal tubular injury biomarker for early prediction of delayed graft function (DGF) in kidney transplant recipients. However, its predictive values in urine and blood were varied among different studies. Here, we performed the meta-analysis to compare the predictive values of urine NGAL (uNGAL) and blood NGAL (bNGAL) for DGF in adult kidney transplant recipients. Methods We systematically searched Medline, Cochrane library and Embase for relevant studies from inception to May 2018. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves, the pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were used to evaluate the prognostic performance of uNGAL and bNGAL for the identification of DGF. Results A total of 1036 patients from 14 eligible studies were included in the analysis. 8 studies focused on NGAL in urine and 6 reported NGAL in serum or plasma. The composite area under the ROC (AUC) for 24 h uNGAL was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94) and the overall DOR for 24 h uNGAL was 24.17(95% CI, 9.94-58.75) with a sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.75-0.94) and a specificity of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.68-0.89). The composite AUC for 24 h bNGAL was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.93-0.97) and the overall DOR for 24 h bNGAL was 43.11 (95% CI, 16.43-113.12) with a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.81-0.96) and a specificity of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78-0.92). Conclusions Urine and serum/plasma NGAL were valuable biomarkers for early identification of DGF in kidney transplantation. In addition, the bNGAL was superior to uNGAL in early prediction of DGF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据