4.1 Article

Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel followed by maintenance treatment with gemcitabine alone as first-line treatment for older adults with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 647-651

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.08.008

关键词

Pancreatic cancer; Gemcitabine; Nab-paclitaxel; Older adults; Maintenance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination Gemcitabine (Gem) plus nab-Paclitaxel (NabP) (Gem/NabP), followed bymaintenance Gemin older adults with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC). Materials and methods: In this prospective observational study, the induction chemotherapy consisted of NabP 125 mg/m(2) followed by Gem 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle. After a maximum of 3 cycles, patients without evidence of progressive disease (PD) were administered Gem 1000 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 of 4 weeks as maintenance therapy until documentation of PD or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was six-month disease-control rate (DCR). Results: Overall, 36 patients >70 years withmetastatic or locally advanced PCwere enrolled at participating Institutions. After completion of Gem/NabP, 18 (50%) patients achieved partial response, 13 (36%) had stable disease, and 5 (14%) had PD. Thirty-one patients (86%) received Gem monotherapy as maintenance treatment for a median of 3 cycles (range, 2-9 cycles). Six-month DCR was 61% (95% CI, 45-77), median PFS was 6.4 months (95% CI, 5.4-8.3), and median OS was 13.4 months (95% CI, 11.1-16.7). During Gem/NabP regimen, the most common grade 3 toxicity included neutropenia (22%), anemia (19%) and thrombocytopenia (8%). Grade 3 neuropathy was not observed. During Gem maintenance therapy, grade 3 hematological toxicity was described in 6 patients (19%). Conclusion: Gem/NabP followed by maintenance Gem appears to be safe and effective for older patients with locally advanced or metastatic PC. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据