4.6 Article

PEDF and PEDF-derived peptide 44mer inhibit oxygen-glucose deprivation-induced oxidative stress through upregulating PPARγ via PEDF-R in H9c2 cells

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.02.110

关键词

PEDF; PEDF-R; Apoptosis; PPAR gamma; Oxygen-glucose deprivation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81570242, 81270173, 81400227]
  2. Natural Science Foundation for colleges and universities in Jiangsu Province [14KJB320026]
  3. Foundation of Jiangsu Province Six Talents Peak [2015-WSN-063]
  4. Xuzhou Medical Young Talents Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pigment epithelial-derived factor (PEDF) is a glycoprotein with broad biological activities including inhibiting oxygen glucose deprivation(OGD)-induced cardiomyocytes apoptosis through its anti oxidative properties. PEDF derived peptide-44mer shows similar cytoprotective effect to PEDF. However, the molecular mechanisms mediating cardiomyocytes apoptosis have not been fully established. Here we found that PEDF and 44mer decreased the content of ROS. This content was abolished by either PEDF-R small interfering RNA (siRNA) or PPAR gamma antagonist. The level of Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and phospholipase A2 (PLA2) was observed as drawn from the ELISA assays. PEDF and 44mer sequentially induced PPAR gamma expression was observed both in qPCR and Western blot assays. The level of LPA and PLA2 and PPAR gamma expression increased by PEDF and 44mer was significantly attenuated by PEDF-R siRNA. However, PEDF and 44mer inhibited the H9c2 cells and cultured neonatal rat myocardial cells apoptosis rate. On the other hand, TUNEL assay and cleavage of procaspase-3 showed that PEDF-R siRNA or PPAR gamma antagonist increased the apoptosis again. We conclude that under OGD condition, PEDF and 44mer reduce H9c2 cells apoptosis and inhibit OGD-induced oxidative stress via its receptor PEDF-R and the PPAR gamma signaling pathway. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据