4.6 Article

A 19 Year Analysis of Small Mammals Associated with Human Hantavirus Cases in Chile

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 11, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v11090848

关键词

Andes orthohantavirus; Chile; hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome; hantavirus spatial distribution; Oligoryzomys longicaudatus; peridomestic; rodent reservoir; seroprevalence

类别

资金

  1. Fogarty International Center Research Grant [D43 TW007131]
  2. NIH-ICIDR Chilean Hantavirus Grant [1 U19 AI45452-01]
  3. FONDECYT [1171280, 1110664, 1130467, 1170761, 3180237, 1161197, 1161447]
  4. CONICYT-PIA [ACT1408]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Small mammals present in areas where hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome (HCPS) cases had occurred in central and southern Chile were captured and analyzed to evaluate the abundance of rodents and seroprevalence rates of antibodies to Andes orthohantavirus (ANDV). Sampling areas ranged from the Coquimbo to Aysen regions (30-45 degrees S approx.) regions. Ninety-two sites in peridomestic and countryside areas were evaluated in 19 years of sampling. An antibody against ANDV was detected by strip immunoassay in 58 of 1847 specimens captured using Sherman traps. Of the eleven species of rodents sampled, Abrothrix olivacea, Oligoryzomys longicaudatus and Abrothrix hirta were the most frequently trapped. O. longicaudatus had the highest seropositivity rate, and by logistic regression analysis, O. longicaudatus of at least 60 g had 80% or higher probability to be seropositive. Sex, age and wounds were significantly related to seropositivity only for O. longicaudatus. Across administrative regions, the highest seropositivity was found in the El Maule region (34.8-36.2 degrees S), and the highest number of HCPS cases was registered in the Aysen region. Our results highlight the importance of long term and geographically extended studies, particularly for highly fluctuating pathogens and their reservoirs, to understand the implications of the dynamics and transmission of zoonotic diseases in human populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据