4.7 Article

Evaluation of system stability and anaerobic conversion performance for corn stover using combined pretreatment

期刊

WASTE MANAGEMENT
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 52-62

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.07.025

关键词

Freezing-thawing; Ammonia; System stability; Corn stover; Methane

资金

  1. National Key Technologies R & D Program of China [2018YFC1900903]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel pretreatment method combining freezing-thawing and ammonia was developed, and the system stability and anaerobic conversion performance of corn stover (CS) were investigated. The CS was pretreated by water freezing-thawing (water-FT) and ammonia freezing-thawing (ammonia-FT), and then pretreated and untreated CS were anaerobically digested in three continuously stirred tank biodigesters (CSTBRs) at three organic loading rate (OLR) of 1.6, 1.8 and 2.0 gVS L-1 d(-1). The analyses showed that pH value and volatile fatty acids (VFAs) concentration of three systems were in reasonable ranges of 6.8-7.5 and 160-330 mg L-1, respectively. Total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) in R3 system ranged from 600 mg L-1 to 1300 mg L-1, which was conducive to maintain system stability. The removal amount of soluble chemical oxygen demand (SCOD) of CS by ammonia-FT pretreatment was 17.3-20.5% higher than that of water-FT pretreatment. The results also showed that CS pretreated by ammonia-FT achieved 27.8-32.4% and 13.9-16.1% more methane yield (250-267 mL g(vs)(-1)) than those of untreated and water FT pretreatment, respectively. Correspondingly, ammonia-FT pretreated CS in R3 obtained the highest conversion rates of 47.7%, 56.9%, 42.7%, and 48.8% for TS, VS, cellulose, and hemicellulose, respectively, and the lowest cost was of 0.0336 USD m(3) CH4-1 and the highest energy recovery of 2428.1 kWh kg(vs)(-1). The study demonstrated that ammonia-FT pretreatment is one of efficient and cost effective method for stable CS bioconversion. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据