4.7 Article

Beijing's 50 million new urban trees: Strategic governance for large-scale urban afforestation

期刊

URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
卷 44, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126392

关键词

Governance; Green infrastructure; Policy Arrangement Approach; Urban afforestation; Urban forestry

资金

  1. Scientific Support Project for the OneMillion-Mu Afforestation Project in Beijing Plain Areas [Z121100008512002]
  2. Graduate Training and Development Program of Beijing Municipal Commission of Education [BLCXY201605]
  3. Item of the Key Research and Development Program of Ningxia [2019BFG02024]
  4. China Scholarship Council [201706510051]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large-scale urban afforestation projects are increasingly used as a way to enhance urban sustainability. Governance of such projects is challenging yet few studies have examined this topic. Between 2012 and 2015, Beijing City implemented the One Million-Mu (666 km(2)) Plain Afforestation Project, which has led to over 50 million trees being planted in the city's plain area and a 10% increase of overall forest cover. We analyzed the governance of this mega planting project through the lens of the Policy Arrangement Approach, with specific attention paid to actors, resources, rules, discourses and their interconnectedness. We found that a strong administrative capacity was in place for the project, and the efficiency and effectiveness of the project were generally good. However, civic participation was insufficient. The extensive use of farmland for afforestation has caused a conflict between the project and farmland conservation. Despite strong leadership of the project, there were still discrepancies between plans and outcomes due to inadequate rule-making during the very short period of planning. Authoritative discourses were dominant through the project, but a few decisions were improperly oriented. Findings from this study can provide important lessons for other cities to plan and implement large urban afforestation projects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据