4.5 Article

IN VITRO SUPERHARMONIC CONTRAST IMAGING USING A HYBRID DUAL-FREQUENCY PROBE

期刊

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 45, 期 9, 页码 2525-2539

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.05.012

关键词

Dual-frequency transducer; Contrast agent; Superharmonic imaging; Acoustic angiography; Plane wave

资金

  1. Canadian Institute of Health Research [FDN 148367]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01 CA189479]
  3. FUJIFILM VisualSonics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Superharmonic imaging is an ultrasound contrast imaging technique that differentiates microbubble echoes from tissue through detection of higher-order bubble harmonics in a broad frequency range well above the excitation frequency. Application of superharmonic imaging in three dimensions allows specific visualization of the tissue microvasculature with high resolution and contrast, a technique referred to as acoustic angiography. Because of the need to transmit and receive across a bandwidth that spans up to the fifth harmonic of the fundamental and higher, this imaging approach requires imaging probes comprising dedicated transducers for transmit and receive. In this work, we report on a new dual-frequency probe including two 1.7-MHz rectangular transducers positioned one on each side of a 20-MHz 256-element array. Finite element modeling-based design, fabrication processes and assembly of the transducer are described, as is integration with a high-frequency ultrasound imaging platform. Dual-frequency single-plane-wave imaging was performed with a microbubble contrast agent in flow phantoms and compared with conventional high-frequency B-mode imaging, and resolution and contrast-to-tissue ratio were quantified. This work represents an intermediate but informative step toward the development of dual-frequency imaging probes based on array technology, specifically designed for clinical applications of acoustic angiography. (C) 2019 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据