4.5 Article

COMBINED ACOUSTIC RADIATION FORCE IMPULSE AND CONVENTIONAL ULTRASOUND IN THE QUANTITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF IMMUNOGLOBULIN A NEPHROPATHY

期刊

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 45, 期 9, 页码 2309-2316

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.05.013

关键词

Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging; IgA nephropathy; Oxford classification; Katafuchi grading

资金

  1. Guangxi Natural Science Foundation project [2015GXNSFBB139010, 2012GXNSFBA053083]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the value of combined acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging and conventional ultrasound (US) in identifying renal histopathological fibrosis with immunoglobulin A nephropathy. A total of 146 patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy, pathologically confirmed by renal biopsy were grouped according to Oxford classification and Katafuchi grading, were included in the test group, and 39 healthy volunteers were included in the control group. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of ARFI, renal lengths, parenchymal thicknesses and interlobular arterial resistance index (RI) and their combinations in identifying Katafuchi grading at renal biopsy. Shear wave velocity (SWV), renal length, renal parenchyma thickness and the interlobular arterial RI were correlated with Katafuchi grading, mesangial hypercellularity (M) and tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis (T) (r = -0.504 to -0.407, p < 0.01) but were not correlated with endocapillary hypercellularity (E) or segmental glomerulosclerosis (S). The area under the curves of SWV value + conventional US index (renal length, renal parenchyma thickness and interlobular arterial RI) was higher than those of the SWV value or of the conventional US index alone. The combination of ARFI imaging and conventional US can improve the diagnostic performance in quantitative evaluation pathologic dam- age in patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy. (C) 2019 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据