4.5 Article

DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF ULTRASOUND SHEAR WAVE ELASTOGRAPHY IN SOLID SMALL (≤4 CM) RENAL PARENCHYMAL MASSES

期刊

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 45, 期 9, 页码 2328-2337

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.05.010

关键词

Kidney neoplasms; Ultrasonography; Shear wave elastography; Differential diagnosis; Renal cell carcinoma

资金

  1. Foundation of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning [20144Y0246]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the study was to analyze the diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography (SWE) in differentiating between malignant and benign solid renal parenchymal masses <= 4 cm, compared with conventional ultrasound. A total of 20 healthy volunteers and 117 patients had been included in this study. Conventional ultrasound and SWE were performed in all volunteers and patients. The elasticity of healthy cortex and the elastic parameters of tumors such as mean elasticity (E-mean), minimum elasticity (E-min), maximum elasticity (E-max), standard deviation and elasticity ratio of the lesion to surrounding cortex (E-ratio) were measured on SWE images. Diagnostic performance of SWE was compared with that of conventional ultrasound. The cortical elasticity values of healthy right and left kidneys were 4.7 +/- 1.7 and 4.5 +/- 1.5 kPa, respectively. Of the 117 renal tumors, 68 were renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and 49 were benign. E-mean, E-min and E-ratio were significantly lower in RCCs compared with benign lesions: E-mean 7.2 +/- 2.5 kPa versus 10.0 +/- 2.4 kPa, E-min 2.5 +/- 2.4 kPa versus 5.6 +/- 2.3 kPa, E-ratio 1.6 +/- 0.5 versus 2.2 +/- 0.6 (all p values < 0.001). The cutoff values of 9.15 kPa for E-mean, 3.55 kPa for E-min and 1.99 for E-ratio had the highest areas under the receiver operating characteristics curve (0.801 for E-mean, 0.832 for E-min and 0.806 for E-ratio). Combining E-mean, E-min and E-ratio with conventional ultrasound improved the specificity for predicting RCCs to 87.8%, but the sensitivity was not increased. (C) 2019 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据