4.7 Article

Scalable fabrication of tunable titanium nanotubes via sonoelectrochemical process for biomedical applications

期刊

ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY
卷 64, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104783

关键词

TiO2 nanotube; Flow cytometry; S. aureus; Drug-modified nanotube; Antibacterial properties

资金

  1. Nanjing Forestry University [NFU163020115, NFU163020139]
  2. NikceramRazi Co.
  3. Jiangsu Science and Technology Plan Project plus National Natural Science Foundation of China (International (Regional) Cooperation and Exchange Program, Research Fund for International Young Scientists) [BK2019044425, NSFC2191101196]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Titanium does not react well with the human tissues and due to its bio-inert nature the surface modification has yet to be well-studied. In this study, the sonoelectrochemical process has been carried out to generate TiO2 nanotube arrays on implantable Ti 6-4. All the prepared nanotubes fill with the vancomycin by immersion and electrophoresis method. Drug-releasing properties, antibacterial behavior, protein adsorption and cell attachment of drug-modified nanotubes are examined by UV-vis, flow cytometry, modified disc diffusion, BSA adsorption, and FESEM, respectively. The most uniform morphology, appropriate drug release, cell viability behavior and antibacterial properties can be achieved by samples anodized in the range of 60-75 V. Also improves the adsorption of BSA protein in bone healing and promotes osteoblast activity and osseointegration. Drug loading efficiency increases up to 60% via electrophoresis comparing the immersion method for anodized sample in 75 V. While electrophoresis does not affect the amount of vancomycin adsorption for lower voltages. Besides, the present study indicates that an anodized sample without drug loading has no antibacterial activity. Moreover, 28-days drug releasing from nanotubes is investigated by mathematical formula according to Fickian's law to find an effective dose of loaded drug.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据