4.7 Review

Fructooligosaccharides production from agro-wastes as alternative low-cost source

期刊

TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 91, 期 -, 页码 139-146

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.06.013

关键词

Agro-wastes; Enzymes; Fructooligosaccharides; Prebiotics

资金

  1. National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT, Mexico) [CVU 860996]
  2. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology - European Regional Development Fund [UID/BIO/04469/2019, NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004, ColOsH 02/SAICT/2017 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-030071)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The prebiotic properties of fructooligosaccharides (FOS) are well documented. The high demand of functional food by the food, pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have lead researchers to explore new and more feasible processes to produce FOS. Not only economical substrates are being exploited to reduce costs, but also, seeking to attend a global problem, the excessive generation of agro-industrial wastes that are polluting the earth, which are not being completely exploited, have been a concern. Scope and approach: The purpose of this review is to present a concise (but wide-ranging) appraisal on the latest advances in fructooligosaccharides production from agro-wastes, as alternative low-cost source. Emphasis is placed on the examination, analysis and discussion of the prospects for using different agro-industrial waste bioresources for the production of FOS and FOS-producing enzymes. Key findings and conclusions: The food, agro-industrial and forestry industries generate large volumes of waste, that are mainly composed of complex carbohydrates and crude proteins, that can be useful as nutrients for microbial growth, and enzymes or other metabolites production. Agro-industrial wastes are discarded, and its accumulation generates a severe environmental impact. The development of value-added processes using agroindustrial wastes is very attractive and becomes an environmentally friendly waste management method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据