4.5 Review

From mass selection to genomic selection: one century of breeding for quantitative yield components of oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.)

期刊

TREE GENETICS & GENOMES
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-019-1373-2

关键词

Elaeis guineensis; Hybrids; Reciprocal recurrent selection; Genomic selection; BLUP; Linear mixed model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

More efficient methods are required to breed oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) for yield maximization in order to meet the increased demand for palm oil while limiting environmental impacts. This review article analyzes the evolution of breeding schemes for oil palm yield and its quantative components and the changes expected to take place with genomic selection (GS). Genetic improvement of oil palm yield started in the 1920s through mass selection. Later, several disruptive improvements dramatically increased the rate of genetic progress: (1) understanding the heredity of fruit form and the adoption of tenera, with thicker mesocarp, in plantations; (2) the discovery of hybrid vigor and the adoption of modified reciprocal recurrent selection; and (3) clonal selection, exploiting intra-hybrid variability. In addition, the use of linear mixed models to estimate genetic values has made selection more efficient. Today, GS appears to be a new disruptive improvement that can speed up breeding schemes by avoiding field trials in some cycles and increase selection intensity by evaluating more candidates. The genetic potential for oil palm yield has increased considerably over one century of breeding. GS is expected to bring the rate of genetic progress to a previously unprecedented level. The future studies on oil palm GS will aim at making it efficient for all yield components. For this purpose, they should focus in particular on the optimization of training populations and on the improvement of prediction models. Minimizing environmental impacts will also require improvement in other aspects (resistance to diseases, cultural practices, etc.).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据