4.7 Article

Optimal vessel speed and fleet size for industrial shipping services under the emission control area regulation

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.038

关键词

Emission control areas; Vessel speed optimization; Continuous-discrete optimization; Industrial shipping

资金

  1. Postdoctoral Fellow Programme of the Ministry of Education of Singapore
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71801099, 71890974/71890970, 71831002, 71961137001]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019T120676, 2017M620323]
  4. research project Tugboat Scheduling for Large Container Ports - Ministry of Education of Singapore [R-726-000-003-646]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to determine the optimal vessel speed and ship fleet size for an industrial shipping service operating through the emission control areas (ECAs). To comply with the ECA regulation, the industrial shipping service operator can adjust its vessel speeds and fleet size to minimize the annual fleet cost, which includes the total fleet operating cost and in-transit cargo inventory cost. A mixed-integer convex cost-minimization model is developed for the determination of optimal vessel speeds and fleet size, in which the vessel speeds are continuous decision variables and the fleet size is an integer decision variable. The analytical optimal solution of the developed model is identified by relaxing the integer restriction of the fleet size variable. It is shown that how the in-transit cargo inventory cost can play a role in changing the way that the optimal vessel speed is identified. We also demonstrate that the minimal annual fleet cost could be attained by simply comparing two candidate analytical solutions. Numerical studies are carried out to investigate the economic and environmental impacts of the ECA regulation on several representative industrial shipping services. Recommendations are also provided on the proper modeling choice of fleet size in different contexts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据