4.6 Article

The prediction value of Treg cell subtype alterations for glucocorticoid treatment in newly diagnosed primary immune thrombocytopenia patients

期刊

THROMBOSIS RESEARCH
卷 181, 期 -, 页码 10-16

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2019.07.001

关键词

Immune thrombocytopenia; Tregs subtypes; CD45; IL-10

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81870098, 81600090, 81500090, 81470282, 81300381]
  2. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [18ZR1407200]
  3. Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau Funding [201840351, 20134y117, 20144Y0194]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune heterogeneous disorder of which Treg cells are numerically or functionally deficient. It is known that human FoxP3(+)CD4(+)T cells were composed of 3 phenotypically and functionally distinct subpopulations (resting Treg, rTreg; activated Treg, aTreg; and non-suppressive Treg, n-sTreg). The current study was aimed to determine whether these Treg subtypes are altered in ITP patients and the related potential clinical applications. Method: Normal control volunteers and newly diagnosed ITP patients were enrolled in the study. The percentage of Treg cells' subtypes in peripheral blood was examined by flow cytometry before and after the glucocorticoid treatment. The IL-10 production by Treg subtypes was also examined. Results: Treg cell subtypes of aTreg increased, rTreg decreased, and n-s Treg increased in newly diagnosed ITP patients' peripheral blood. The IL-10 production by respective Treg subtype didn't change after the treatment, and aTreg cells had the highest IL-10 yield. Patients who gained remission during follow-up had a higher aTreg cells' percentage than those who did not at the disease diagnosis. Conclusion: Tregs cell subtypes percentage was altered when ITP occurred. The increased aTreg cells at disease diagnosis might predict a better glucocorticoid treatment efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据