4.7 Article

Stress-strain model of an FRP-confined concrete filled steel tube under axial compression

期刊

THIN-WALLED STRUCTURES
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 149-159

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2019.05.009

关键词

Fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP); Steel tube; Confined concrete; Axial compression; Stress-strain model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51778300]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20151520]
  3. 333 Project [BRA2016421]
  4. Qinglan Project of Jiangsu Province [QL2017]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An FRP (fiber-reinforced polymer) -confined concrete filled steel tube is formed by the combination of FRP material and a concrete filled steel tube, and it combines the advantages of FRP-confined concrete and a concrete filled steel tube (CFT); however, there is still no effective model to generally describe the complete stress-strain curve of a concrete filled FRP-confined steel tube. The stress-strain response of a concrete filled FRP-confined steel tube features the dual characteristics of both FRP confined concrete and steel confined concrete. In this paper, ninety-six test results of FRP confined circular CFT columns under axial compression were collected from different researchers. The steel tube confinement index is taken as an additional key influencing parameter on the strength and deformation, and calculation methods for the ultimate strain, ultimate stress, peak strain and peak stress of a concrete filled FRP-confined steel tube are established by taking into account the steel tube confinement index. Moreover, the stress-strain model was developed to describe the complete stress-strain curve consisting of the four stages of a concrete filled FRP-confined steel tube. The proposed model reflects the characteristics of the stress-strain behavior of a concrete filled FRP-confined steel tube with good accuracy and simplicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据