4.6 Article

Postobductional Kinematic Evolution and Geomorphology of a Major Regional Structure-The Semail Gap Fault Zone (Oman Mountains)

期刊

TECTONICS
卷 38, 期 8, 页码 2756-2778

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2019TC005588

关键词

dextral transtension; gravitational; postorogenic collapse

资金

  1. Sultan Qaboos University [IG/SCI/ERTH/16/01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Semail Gap/Semail Gap Fault Zone is one of the most prominent tectonic features in the Oman Mountains and is located between the Jabal Akhdar Dome in the west and the Saih Hatat Dome to the east. The two domes were uplifted during the Late Eocene to Early Miocene. Uplift led to monoclinal bending with a fold axis parallel to the Semail Gap. Subsequently, dextral transtensional faulting along the Semail Gap Fault Zone ensued. This fault zone follows a major preexisting fault, which explains the distribution differences of Neoproterozoic and Phanerozoic sedimentary formations (partly omissions) across this structure. The vertical and horizontal displacements along the Semail Gap amount to up to similar to 5.5 and <= 2 km, respectively. Vertical displacement may be a combination of monoclinal bending and later faulting along the Semail Gap Fault Zone. Its latest activity mainly preceded the Quaternary because there is only minor faulting of Quaternary deposits. Despite ongoing uplift of the Oman Mountains, which may amount to <= 50 m during the Quaternary based on incision of wadi/alluvial terraces, only insignificant seismicity is observed and attributed to minor movements along this fault zone. The transtensional deformation is a result of uplift and orogenic/gravitational collapse of the Jabal Akhdar/Saih Hatat domes. The neighboring two hanging wall blocks of each dome moved downward, ESE/SE and SSW/SW, which explains dextral transtension along the Semail Gap Fault Zone. The Semail Gap Fault Zone has a sinistral transtensional counterpart at the southwestern margin of the Nakhl Subdome/Saih Hatat Dome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据