4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Should multifocality be an indication for completion thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid carcinoma?

期刊

SURGERY
卷 167, 期 1, 页码 10-16

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.03.031

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA008748]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Multifocality in papillary thyroid carcinoma is common. The aim of this study is to determine whether patients with multifocal disease, treated with lobectomy alone, have an increased risk of contralateral lobe papillary thyroid carcinoma, regional recurrence, and poorer survival. Methods: After institutional review board approval, papillary thyroid carcinoma patients managed from 1986 to 2015 with lobectomy alone were identified from an institutional database. Papillary thyroid carcinoma patients with pT3 to T4 classification, nodal disease, or distant metastases were excluded. After excluding 40 patients who underwent an immediate completion thyroidectomy, 849 were included in the analysis; 619 (72.9%) had unifocal disease and 230 (27.1%) had multifocal disease. Contralateral lobe papillary thyroid carcinoma-free probability, regional recurrence-free probability, disease-specific survival, and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: With a median follow-up of 58 months, unifocal disease and multifocal disease patients had similar rates of contralateral lobe papillary thyroid carcinoma, regional recurrence, and overall survival (10-year contralateral lobe papillary thyroid carcinoma-free probability 98.6% vs 97.8%; regional recurrence-free probability 99.5% vs 99.4%; overall survival 91.6% vs 93.1%, respectively). There were no disease-related deaths. Conclusion: Select multifocal disease patients, managed with lobectomy alone, have rates of contralateral lobe papillary thyroid carcinoma, regional recurrence, and overall survival comparable to unifocal disease patients. Multifocal disease should not be an indication for completion thyroidectomy. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据