4.7 Article

Direct simulation of two-dimensional isotropic or anisotropic random field from sparse measurement using Bayesian compressive sampling

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-019-01718-7

关键词

Spatial data; Anisotropy; Karhunen-Loeve expansion; Compressive sensing

资金

  1. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [CityU 11225216, T22-603/15N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Random field theory has been increasingly adopted to simulate spatially varying environmental properties and hydrogeological data in recent years. In a two-dimensional (2D) stochastic analysis, variation of the environmental properties or hydrogeological data along different directions can be similar (i.e., isotropic) or quite different (i.e., anisotropic). To model the spatially isotropic or anisotropic variability in a stochastic analysis, conventional random field generators generally require a vast amount of measurement data to identify the random field parameters (e.g., mean, variance, and correlation structure and correlation length in different directions). However, measurement data available in practice are usually sparse and limited. The random field parameters estimated from sparse measurements might be unreliable, and the subsequent random field modeling or stochastic analysis might be misleading. This underscores the significance and challenge of generating 2D isotropic or anisotropic random fields from sparse measurements. This paper develops a novel 2D random field generator, which does not require a parametric form of correlation function or estimation of correlation length and other random field parameters, and directly generates 2D isotropic or anisotropic random field samples from sparse measurements. The proposed generator is highly efficient because simulation of a 2D random field is achieved by generation of a short 1D random vector. The effectiveness and applicability of the proposed generator are illustrated using isotropic and anisotropic numerical examples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据