4.6 Article

Parameter estimation of photovoltaic models with memetic adaptive differential evolution

期刊

SOLAR ENERGY
卷 190, 期 -, 页码 465-474

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2019.08.022

关键词

Photovoltaic models; Parameter estimation; Differential evolution; Nelder-Mead simplex method

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61573324, 61873328]
  2. National Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of China [61525304]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) [CUGGC03]
  4. Open Research Fund of the State Key Lab of Digital Manufacturing Equipment Technology [DMETKF2019018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parameter estimation of photovoltaic (PV) models plays an important role in the simulation, evaluation, and control of PV systems. In the past decade, although many meta-heuristic methods have been devoted to parameter estimation of PV models and achieved satisfactory results, they may suffer from consuming large computational resources to get promising performance. In order to fast and accurately estimate the parameters of PV models, in this paper, a memetic adaptive differential evolution, namely MADE, is developed. The proposed MADE can be featured as: (i) the success-history based adaptive differential evolution is used for the global search; (ii) the Nelder-Mead simplex method is employed for the local search to refine the solution; and (iii) the ranking-based elimination strategy is proposed to maintain the promising solutions in the external archive. To verify the performance of our approach, it is applied to estimate the unknown parameters of different PV models, Le., the single diode model, the double diode model, and the PV module. Experimental results obtained by MADE are compared with several state-of-the-art methods reported in the literature. Comparison analysis demonstrates that the proposed MADE exhibits remarkable performance on accuracy and reliability. It also consumes less computational resources than other compared methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据