4.8 Article

Rational Design of Ultrathin Gas Barrier Layer via Reconstruction of Hexagonal Boron Nitride Nanoflakes to Enhance the Chemical Stability of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells

期刊

SMALL
卷 15, 期 44, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201903705

关键词

gas barrier layer; gas crossover; hexagonal boron nitride; oxygen radicals; proton exchange membrane fuel cells

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [2017R1A2B2010663]
  2. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  3. Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea [20173010032100]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017R1A2B2010663] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) has great potential as a promising gas barrier layer in proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) as it shows high proton conductivity as well as excellent gas-blocking capability. However, structural defects and mechanical damage during the transfer of the hBN layer and membrane swelling have limited the application of hBN sheets to PEMFCs. Here, an ultrathin gas barrier layer is successfully fabricated on a proton exchange membrane via reconstruction of mechanically exfoliated hBN nanoflakes using a direct spin-coating process. The hBN-coated layer effectively suppresses the gas crossover and inhibits the formation of reactive oxygen radicals in the electrodes without reducing the proton conductivity of the membrane. It is also demonstrated that the structural advantages of hBN-coated gas barrier layers promise high performance of a unit cell even after a open-circuit voltage (OCV) hold test for 100 h. Furthermore, through in-depth postmortem analyses, a time-dependent degradation mechanism of membrane electrode assembly under the OCV condition is rationally proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据