4.8 Article

Nb2O5/RGO Nanocomposite Modified Separators with Robust Polysulfide Traps and Catalytic Centers for Boosting Performance of Lithium-Sulfur Batteries

期刊

SMALL
卷 15, 期 40, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201902363

关键词

catalysis; in situ XRD; lithium-sulfur batteries; Nb2O5 nanocrystals; polysulfides transformation

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [lzujbky-2018-33, lzujbky-2016-112] Funding Source: Medline
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11674138, 11504147] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium-sulfur batteries (LSBs) have shown great potential for application in high-density energy storage systems. However, the performance of LSBs is hindered by the shuttle effect and sluggish reaction kinetics of lithium polysulfides (LiPSs). Herein, heterostructual Nb2O5 nanocrystals/reduced graphene oxide (Nb2O5/RGO) composites are introduced into LSBs through separator modification for boosting the electrochemical performance. The Nb2O5/RGO heterostructures are designed as chemical trappers and conversion accelerators of LiPSs. Originating from the strong chemical interactions between Nb2O5 and LiPSs as well as the superior catalytic nature of Nb2O5, the Nb2O5/RGO nanocomposite possesses high trapping efficiency and efficient electrocatalytic activity to long-chain LiPSs. The effective regulation of LiPSs conversion enables the LSBs enhanced redox kinetics and suppressed shuttle effect. Moreover, the Nb2O5/RGO nanocomposite has abundant sulfophilic sites and defective interfaces, which are beneficial for the nucleation and growth of Li2S, as evidenced by analysis of the cycled separators. As a result, LSBs with the Nb2O5/RGO-modified separators exhibit excellent rate capability (816 mAh g(-1) at 3 A g(-1)) and cyclic performance (628 mAh g(-1) after 500 cycles). Remarkably, high specific capacity and stable cycling performance are demonstrated even at an elevated temperature of 50 degrees C or with higher sulfur loadings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据