4.7 Article

Flotation of coarse particles by hydrodynamic cavitation generated in the presence of conventional reagents

期刊

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 220, 期 -, 页码 61-68

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.03.033

关键词

Particle size; Airflow rate; Impeller speed; Conventional flotation bubbles; Nanobubble

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) (typically used to generate submicron bubbles) are frequently examined to improve froth flotation efficiency of ultrafine particles (-38 mu m); however, the study of their effects on flotation parameters during the process of coarse particles ( +100 mu m) was not significantly explored. The main aim of this investigation is to discover the impacts of HC on effective flotation variables and flotation recovery of coarse particles (FRCP). Various surfactants (frothers: Methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC) and pine oil (PO), and dodecyl amine (DDA)) were used for the HC conditions. For comparison purposes, two series of flotation experiments in the absence and presence of HC were conducted by using coarse pure quartz particles (-425 + 106 mu m). Variable importance measurements (VIMs) of random forest were applied to compare and assess impacts of flotation parameters (particle size, flotation conventional bubble (CB) size, impeller speed, and air flow rate) on FRCP in the absence and presence of HC. Outputs of VIMs indicated that the negative effect of particle size on FRCP was decreased and the capability of CB for floating coarse particles was improved in the presence of HC. Moreover, VIM results showed that in the presence of HC, the highest FRCP can be achieved when turbulent is lower. Generally, variations in the airflow rate had negligible impacts on FRCP. Flotation experiments suggested that HC in the presence of the collector can overcome the absence of frothers in a flotation system. These results can be used for enhancement of selective separation via froth flotation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据