4.7 Article

QCM-based humidity sensor and sensing properties employing colloidal SnO2 nanowires

期刊

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
卷 293, 期 -, 页码 129-135

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.05.009

关键词

Quartz crystal microbalance; Humidity sensor; Colloidal SnO2 nanowires; Density Functional Theory

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0402700]
  2. Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Municipality [JCYJ20160414102255597]
  3. Joint Open Fund of Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Ecological Building Material and Environmental Protection Equipment's
  4. Fund for the Innovation Foundation of Shenzhen Government [JCYJ20160429182829578]
  5. Key Laboratory for Advanced Technology in Environmental Protection of Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM)-based humidity sensor has been fabricated by colloidal fin oxide (SnO2) nanowires. The SnO2 nanowires were synthesized via a colloidal process that employing SnCl4 ethanol solutions mixed with oleic acid (OA) and oleylamine (OLA). The spin-coating method was chosen to deposit the sensitive film at room temperature without high-temperature sintering. Furthermore, the Cu(NO3)(2) methanol solution was used to remove the organic long chains coated on the surface of the colloidal SnO2 nanowires and expose more adsorption sites. The characterizations of the material were studied by means of FTIR, XRD, and FE-SEM. The saturated salt solution method was used to investigate the humidity sensing performance (response, recovery, repeatability, etc.) of the QCM sensor in the range of 11%-97%. The results showed that the sample with 12 h synthesis has the best humidity response. This may be attributed to the larger specific surface area which makes the material provide more adsorption sites for water molecules, and more (110) planes formed which could absorb more water molecules proved by the Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据