4.6 Article

Carbon-Based Electrode Materials for Microsupercapacitors in Self-Powering Sensor Networks: Present and Future Development

期刊

SENSORS
卷 19, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s19194231

关键词

microsupercapacitors; energy storage; self-powering systems; IoT; sensor networks

资金

  1. Vinnova UDI-2: Miniaturized self-powered industrial sensor systems using energy harvesting technologies [2017-03725]
  2. Vinnova project NFFP7: Architecture for high-power radars [2017-04869]
  3. Chalmers Foundation
  4. Helge Ax:son Johnsons stiftelse [F19-0050]
  5. Area of Advance-Project MESSIAH: Microelectronic Energy Storage Systems Integrated Alongside Harvesters

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is an urgent need to fulfill future energy demands for micro and nanoelectronics. This work outlines a number of important design features for carbon-based microsupercapacitors, which enhance both their performance and integration potential and are critical for complimentary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) compatibility. Based on these design features, we present CMOS-compatible, graphene-based microsupercapacitors that can be integrated at the back end of the line of the integrated circuit fabrication. Electrode materials and their interfaces play a crucial role for the device characteristics. As such, different carbon-based materials are discussed and the importance of careful design of current collector/electrode interfaces is emphasized. Electrode adhesion is an important factor to improve device performance and uniformity. Additionally, doping of the electrodes can greatly improve the energy density of the devices. As microsupercapacitors are engineered for targeted applications, device scaling is critically important, and we present the first steps toward general scaling trends. Last, we outline a potential future integration scheme for a complete microsystem on a chip, containing sensors, logic, power generation, power management, and power storage. Such a system would be self-powering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据