4.7 Article

Technologies-based potential analysis on saving energy and water of China's iron and steel industry

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 699, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134225

关键词

Iron and steel industry; Technical level; Energy- and water-saving potential; Energy and water consumption; Scenario analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41871212, 41601609]
  2. Research Project of Northeastern University [N172504031]
  3. China Scholarship Council [201606085050]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water and energy conservation are indispensable commitments to achieve the sustainable development of the iron and steel industry. Hereby, this study established an evaluation framework to model the water and energy consumption in the iron and steel industry. This framework quantitatively assessed the energy and water saving with adoption of conventional and emerging technologies. Thirty mainstream technologies, among which 21 focused on energy saving and the remaining 9 focused on water saving, were selected for analysis. Five scenarios were developed to examine systematic water- and energy-saving potentials, including benchmark (BM) scenario, constrained product (CP) scenario, business as usual (BAU) scenario, and benefit/cost-driven (BD) scenario and strengthened policy (SP) scenario. The results show that the energy-saving potentials of BAU, BD and SP scenarios are 1.75 PJ, 1.21 PJ and 1.65 PJ, respectively. The water-saving potentials of BAU, BD and SP scenarios are 4.83 billion m(3), 5.71 billion m(3) and 9.15 billion m(3), respectively. The specific energy consumption and water consumption decreased to 15.01-15.59 GJ/t and 54.13-58.77 m(3)/t, respectively. This study suggested to implement encouraging policies in prompt popularity rate of technologies, and promote energy-saving and water-saving technologies to achieve sustainable development of iron and steel industry. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据