4.7 Article

Organic degrading bacteria and nitrifying bacteria stimulate the nutrient removal and biomass accumulation in microalgae-based system from piggery digestate

期刊

SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
卷 707, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134442

关键词

Microalgae-based system; Commercial bacterial agent; Nutrient removal; Biomass accumulation; Microbial community

资金

  1. Hangzhou Science and Technology Project [AZ22019002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The microalgae-based system has been applied in anaerobic digestate treatment for nutrient removal and biomass production. To optimize its performance in treating piggery digestate, here, commercial bacterial agents, including organic degrading bacteria (Cb) and nitrifying bacteria (Nb), were inoculated into the microalgae-based system dominated by Desmodesmus sp. CHX1 (D). Reactor DN (inoculated with D and Nb) and DCN (inoculated with D, and Cb to Nb at a ratio of 1:2) have better performance on NH4+-N removal, with a final efficiency at 40.26% and 39.87%, respectively, and no NO3-N or NO2-N accumulations. The final total chlorophyll concentration, an indicator of microalgal growth, reached 4.74 and 5.47 mg/L in DN and DCN, respectively, three times more than that in D. These results suggested that high NH4+-N removal was achieved by the assimilation into high microalgal biomass after the inoculation with functional bacteria. High-throughput sequencing showed that the richness of microbial community decreased but the evenness increased by inoculating functional microorganisms. Microalgae aggregating bacteria were Cellvibrio, Sphingobacterium, Flavobacterium, Comamonas, Microbacterium, Dyadobacter, and Paenibacillus. This study revealed that the inoculation with functional bacteria reconstructed the microbial community which benefited for the microalgal growth and nutrient removal, providing a promising strategy for treating highly-concentrated digestate. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据