4.8 Article

Major subpopulations of Plasmodium falciparum in sub-Saharan Africa

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 365, 期 6455, 页码 813-+

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.aav5427

关键词

-

资金

  1. DELTAS Africa Initiative, an independent funding scheme of the African Academy of Sciences (AAS)'s Alliance for Accelerating Excellence in Science in Africa (AESA)
  2. New Partnership for Africa's Development Planning and Coordinating Agency (NEPAD Agency)
  3. Wellcome (DELGEME grant) [107740/Z/15/Z]
  4. U. K. government
  5. Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center (AFHSB) and its Global Emerging Infections Surveillance (GEIS) Section [P0209_15_KY]
  6. Wellcome [206194, 090770/Z/09/Z]
  7. MRC Centre for Genomics and Global Health - Medical Research Council [G0600718, M006212]
  8. MRC Centre for Genomics and Global Health - Department for International Development (DFID) [G0600718, M006212]
  9. MRC [MC_EX_MR/K02440X/1, MR/M006212/1, G0600718] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Wellcome Trust [090770/Z/09/Z, 107740/Z/15/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding genomic variation and population structure of Plasmodium falciparum across Africa is necessary to sustain progress toward malaria elimination. Genome clustering of 2263 P. falciparum isolates from 24 malaria-endemic settings in 15 African countries identified major western, central, and eastern ancestries, plus a highly divergent Ethiopian population. Ancestry aligned to these regional blocs, overlapping with both the parasite's origin and with historical human migration. The parasite populations are interbred and shared genomic haplotypes, especially across drug resistance loci, which showed the strongest recent identity-by-descent between populations. A recent signature of selection on chromosome 12 with candidate resistance loci against artemisinin derivatives was evident in Ghana and Malawi. Such selection and the emerging substructure may affect treatment-based intervention strategies against P. falciparum malaria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据