4.5 Article

Neuronal-specific microexon splicing of TAF1 mRNA is directly regulated by SRRM4/nSR100

期刊

RNA BIOLOGY
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 62-74

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15476286.2019.1667214

关键词

Alternative mRNA splicing; microexons; neuronal transcription; neurogenesis; basal transcription factors; TAF1; X-linked Dystonia Parkinsonism

资金

  1. Collaborative Centre for X-linked Dystonia Parkinsonism
  2. James and Pat Poitras Research Fund
  3. Saks Kavanaugh Foundation
  4. Stichting Parkinson Fonds
  5. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB850, SFB992, GR 1748/6-1, SCHI 871/8-1, SCHI 871/9-1, SCHI 871/11-1, INST 39/900-1, INST 39/766-3, Re1584/6-2]
  6. Excellence Initiative of the German Federal and State Governments [EXC 294, GSC-4]
  7. German-Israel Foundation [I-1444-201.2/2017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neuronal microexons represent the most highly conserved class of alternative splicing events and their timed expression shapes neuronal biology, including neuronal commitment and differentiation. The six-nt microexon 34MODIFIER LETTER PRIME is included in the neuronal form of TAF1 mRNA, which encodes the largest subunit of the basal transcription factor TFIID. In this study, we investigate the tissue distribution of TAF1-34MODIFIER LETTER PRIME mRNA and protein and the mechanism responsible for its neuronal-specific splicing. Using isoform-specific RNA probes and antibodies, we observe that canonical TAF1 and TAF1-34MODIFIER LETTER PRIME have different distributions in the brain, which distinguish proliferating from post-mitotic neurons. Knockdown and ectopic expression experiments demonstrate that the neuronal-specific splicing factor SRRM4/nSR100 promotes the inclusion of microexon 34MODIFIER LETTER PRIME into TAF1 mRNA, through the recognition of UGC sequences in the poly-pyrimidine tract upstream of the regulated microexon. These results show that SRRM4 regulates temporal and spatial expression of alternative TAF1 mRNAs to generate a neuronal-specific TFIID complex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据