4.7 Article

The mixture of sewage sludge and biomass waste as solid biofuels: Process characteristic and environmental implication

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 707-717

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.119

关键词

Oxy-fuel (O-2/CO2); Solid biofuels; Synergistic effect; TGA-MS; XRF

资金

  1. Scientific and Technological Planning Project of Guangzhou, China [201704030109, 2016201604030058]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51806040, 51608129]
  3. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China [2019B020208017, 2018A050506046, 2017A040403044, 2017A050501036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxy-fuel and air atmospheres were used to (co-)combust sewage sludge (SS) and biomass waste, coffee ground residues (CG) via thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The combustion behavior of SS did not differ significantly in both atmospheres. The replacement of 79%N-2 by 79%CO2 significantly influenced the char combustion of CG. Synergistic effect of the blends in the oxy-fuel was weaker than air condition. Activation energy of the co-combustion in the second stage was lower in the oxy-fuel than air atmosphere. The gaseous emissions during blend fuel combustion were investigated by online mass spectrometry (MS). Results show that the gas emissions of different fuels show different stage characteristics. CH3, H2O, C2H2 and NO emissions peaked from the volatiles combustion of CG, while the co-combustion led to SO2 increment. Besides, the composition of the solid residues was examined by X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF), and their impact on environment was evaluated. The compositions of the solid residues pointed to the ability of SS to lower the fouling and slagging risks of CG. This investigation aimed to afford a fully understanding for the co-combustion progress of SS and CG under air and oxy-fuel environments and its implication for environment. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据