4.8 Review

Synthesis of γ-valerolactone from different biomass-derived feedstocks: Recent advances on reaction mechanisms and catalytic systems

期刊

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 140-157

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.039

关键词

Lignocellulosic biomass; gamma-valerolactone; Platform chemical; Reaction mechanism; Catalytic conversion

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB1501500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51876180, 21690083, 21503144]
  3. Tianjin High Technology Support Project [16PTGCCX00170, 16YFXTSF00540]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a natural renewable resource, the catalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass is considered to be an important strategy to alleviate the tremendous dependence on fossil resources. The synthesis of gamma-valerolactone (GVL), which is hailed as a new-generation of biomass-based platform molecule, is one of the pivotal steps in the transformation of biomass resources into liquid fuels and high-value chemicals. The catalytic routes for the synthesis of GVL from lignocellulosic feedstocks have been continuously enriched and improved in recent years. Herein, our principal focus is the reaction mechanisms and catalytic systems of GVL from various biomass-derived feedstocks. The specific reaction routes and catalytic performances of GVL synthesis based on the traditional basic raw materials such as levulinic acid (LA) and alkyl levulinates (AL) were discussed and compared, and one-pot processes with cascade steps of cellulosic and hemicellulosic derivatives such as furfural (Fur), furfuryl alcohol (FAL) as well as cellulosic carbohydrates into GVL were also summarized and analyzed in detail. A more intuitive and comprehensive retrospection of the up-to-date literatures on GVL synthesis through multiple pathways was presented, and practical suggestions on improving the cost, stability and efficiency of the overall catalytic systems were also proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据