4.6 Article

DBI/ACBP loss-of-function does not affect anxiety-like behaviour but reduces anxiolytic responses to diazepam in mice

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 313, 期 -, 页码 201-207

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.06.052

关键词

Endozepines; Benzodiazepine; Anxiety; Astrocytes; Genetic invalidation; GABA(A)

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP115042]
  2. Fonds de Recherche Quebec-Sante
  3. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  4. Canadian Diabetes Association
  5. Estrie Diabete Quebec
  6. CRCHUM Grand Labo
  7. Diabete Quebec
  8. University of Montreal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diazepam is well known for its anxiolytic properties, which are mediated via activation of the GABA(A) receptor. Diazepam Binding Inhibitor (DBI), also called acyl-CoA binding protein (ACBP), is a ubiquitously expressed protein originally identified based on its ability to displace diazepam from its binding site on the GABA(A) receptor. Central administration of ACBP or its cleaved fragment, commonly referred to as endozepines, induces proconflict and anxiety-like behaviour in rodents. For this reason, ACBP is known as an anxiogenic peptide. However, the role of endogenous ACBP in anxiety-like behaviour and anxiolytic responses to diazepam has not been investigated. To address this question, we assessed anxiety behaviour and anxiolytic responses to diazepam in two complementary loss-of-function mouse models including astrocyte-specific ACBP KO (ACBP(GFAP) KO) and whole-body KO (ACBP KO) mice. Male and female ACBP(GFAP) KO and ACBP KO mice do not show significant changes in anxiety-like behaviour compared to control littermates during elevated plus maze (EPM) and open field (OF) tests. Surprisingly, ACBP(GFAP) KO and ACBP KO mice were unresponsive to the anxiolytic effect of a low dose of diazepam during EPM tests. In conclusion, our experiments using genetic ACBP loss-of-function models suggest that endozepines deficiency does not affect anxiety-like behaviour in mice and impairs the anxiolytic action of diazepam. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据