4.7 Article

Thermal cycling behavior of nanostructured and conventional yttria-stabilized zirconia thermal barrier coatings via air plasma spray

期刊

RARE METALS
卷 42, 期 11, 页码 3859-3869

出版社

NONFERROUS METALS SOC CHINA
DOI: 10.1007/s12598-019-01319-x

关键词

TBC; Nanocrystalline; TGO; Thermal cycling; Toughness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two TBC systems with different top coats (4YSZ and YSZ) were deposited onto a Ni-based single crystal superalloy using arc ion plating and air plasma spray techniques. The 4YSZ TBC exhibited superior thermal cycling resistance and higher toughness compared to conventional YSZ TBC. Cracks and spallation occurred at the interface of top coat and TGO layer in 4YSZ TBCs, while in YSZ TBCs, cracks initiated and propagated along the lamellar interface in the top coat.
Two thermal barrier coating (TBC) systems comprising NiCoCrAlY bond coat onto a second-generation Ni-based single crystal superalloy and nanostructured 4 mol% Y2O3-stabilized ZrO2 (4YSZ) and conventional yttria-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) top coats upwardly were deposited by approaches of arc ion plating (AIP) and air plasma spray (APS). As indicted by the experimental results, the 4YSZ TBCs exhibited superior thermal cycling resistance compared with conventional YSZ TBCs at 1100 degrees C. The 4YSZ top coat exhibited higher toughness due to its intrinsic property of nanocrystalline structure, homogeneously distributed and diverse directions of pores and preexisted cracks. The cracks and spallation in 4YSZ TBCs occurred at the interface of top coat and thermally grown oxide (TGO) layer. Instead, the crack initiation and propagation started along the lamellar interface in the top coat of conventional YSZ TBCs, leading to the rapid crack bridging and subsequent spalling of top coat. Additionally, before and after oxidation, the 4YSZ top coat showed higher hardness compared to conventional YSZ top coat. Degradation mechanism and distribution of residual stress in TGO for the 4YSZ TBCs were investigated in the current study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据