4.6 Article

Short-term exercise training improves cardiac function associated to a better antioxidant response and lower type 3 iodothyronine deiodinase activity after myocardial infarction

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 14, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222334

关键词

-

资金

  1. CAPES (PROSUP/2015)
  2. FAPPIC [UP5113/15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims We assessed the effects of a short-term exercise training on cardiac function, oxidative stress markers, and type 3 iodothyronine deiodinase (D3) activity in cardiac tissue of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) following experimental myocardial infarction (MI). Methods Twenty-four SHR (aged 3 months) were allocated to 4 groups: sham+sedentary, sham +trained, MI+sedentary and MI+trained. MI was performed by permanent ligation of the coronary artery. Exercise training (treadmill) started 96 hours after MI and lasted for 4 weeks (similar to 60% maximum effort, 4x/week and 40 min/day). Cardiac function (echocardiography), thioredoxin reductase (TRx), total carbonyl levels, among other oxidative stress markers and D3 activity were measured. A Generalized Estimating Equation was used, followed by Bonferroni's test (p< 0.05). Results MI resulted in an increase in left ventricular mass (p = 0.002) with decreased cardiac output (similar to 22.0%, p = 0.047) and decreased ejection fraction (similar to 41%, p = 0.008) as well as an increase in the carbonyl levels (p = 0.001) and D3 activity (similar to 33%, p< 0.001). Exercise training resulted in a decrease in left ventricular mass, restored cardiac output (similar to 34%, p = 0.048) and ejection fraction (similar to 20%, p = 0.040), increased TRx (similar to 85%, p = 0.007) and reduced carbonyl levels (p< 0.001) and D3 activity (p< 0.001). Conclusions Our short-term exercise training helped reverse the effects of MI on cardiac function. These benefits seem to derive from a more efficient antioxidant response and lower D3 activity in cardiac tissue.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据