4.5 Article

Corticosterone triggers high-pitched nestlings' begging calls and affects parental behavior in the wild zebra finch

期刊

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 1665-1675

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arw069

关键词

acoustic signaling; call spectrum; hormone; nestling provisioning; parental care; stress response

资金

  1. French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
  2. IUF grant (Institut Universitaire de France)
  3. Australian Research Council [DP0881019]
  4. International Macquarie University Research Excellence Scholarship
  5. Macquarie University Research Excellence Scholarship
  6. Fyssen Fellowship
  7. Australian Research Council [DP0881019] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nestlings beg to parents to communicate their need. Nevertheless, the specific signal driving parental care remains only partially understood. No study to date has been able to link a specific change in the physiological state of the young with, on the one hand, the modulation of a precise component of its begging behavior and, on the other hand, a direct modification of parental behavior reflecting an adjustment to an appropriate level of care. Here we orally administrated either exogenous corticosterone or a peanut oil control to free-living zebra finch nestlings and recorded begging behavior directly after treatment. Using a continuous automated monitoring system to record parental behavior in the wild, we simultaneously monitored the rate and duration of parental nest visits and foraging behavior at artificial feeders during 6 days posttreatment. We show that corticosterone modified the begging calls' spectrum. Parents of corticosterone-treated broods spent more time in the nest and in feeders, and their older nestlings gained more body mass. Begging calls thus show a corticosterone-driven flexibility, which may inform parents of nestlings' physiological state and allow them to provide an appropriate level of care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据