4.7 Article

Growth and photosynthetic responses in Brassica napus differ during stress and recovery periods when exposed to combined heat, drought and elevated CO2

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 59-72

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.06.026

关键词

Brassica napus L.; Heatwave; Drought; Elevated CO2; Gas exchange; Recovery

资金

  1. European Social Fund [09.3.3-LMT-K-712-02-0049]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was intended to investigate how an agronomically important crop Brassica napus will be able to cope with the combined impact of a heatwave (21/14 degrees C vs. 33/26 degrees C day/night) and drought under ambient or elevated CO2 (800 vs. 400 mu mol mol(-1)) and to what degree their recovery will be ensured after the stress, when additional CO2 is also removed. The obtained results revealed that, in the presence of an adequate water supply, B. napus performed well under heatwave conditions. However, drought fully negated all the advantages gained from hotter climate and led to a slower and incomplete recovery of gas exchange and retarded growth after the stress, regardless mitigating the effect of elevated CO2 during the stress. The mechanism by which the elevated CO2 diminished the adverse effect of a combined heat and drought stress on photosynthetic rate at saturating light (A(sat)) was attributed to the improved plant water relations. However, it had little effect on the recovery of A(sat). In contrast, the mechanism by which photosynthesis was more impaired under the combination of heatwave and drought, compared to, single drought treatment, was attributed mainly to the faster soil drying as well as faster and sharper decrease in stomatal conductance and subsequent in C-i/C-a. Keeping in mind that photosynthesis can acclimatize by downregulation to higher CO2, the results of this study, showing a weak memory of mitigating the effect of elevated CO2, highlight a potential risk of more intense and frequent heatwaves and droughts on B. napus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据