4.7 Article

Modulation of the defence responses against Cd in willow species through a multifaceted analysis

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 125-136

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.07.005

关键词

Antioxidant response; Cadmium; Histochemistry; Oxidative stress; Photosynthetic efficiency; Willow

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Willow, due to the extensive root system, high transpiration rates and ability to accumulate large amounts of cadmium, is considered particularly useful for green remediation practices. In this study two different willow species, Salix viminalis and Salix alba, were used to assess possible differences in their ability of cadmium accumulation and to analyse in detail the physiology of their response to treatments with this metal using a multidisciplinary approach. Plants were grown in hydroponics and treated with 0, 50 and 100 mu M Cd2+ (CdCl2) for 7 and 14 days. Cadmium content, oxidative stress, both evaluated by biochemical and histochemical techniques, antioxidant response, leaf stomatal conductance and photosynthetic efficiency were measured in control and treated roots and/or leaves. The two willow species removed cadmium with a high efficiency from the growth solution; however, the highest contents of Cd recorded in plants grown in the presence of the lower Cd concentrations suggest a limited capacity of metal accumulation. No photochemical limitation characterised treated plants, probably due to the ability to store large amounts of Cd in the root compartment, with reduction of damage to the photosynthetic machinery. S. viminalis, able to uptake cadmium also in the root apical region, seemed to be a more efficient accumulator than S. alba and, thanks to a relatively higher antioxidant response, did not show a higher level of oxidative stress. On the basis of the above, the two plant species, in particular S. viminalis, are confirmed as useful for cadmium phytostabilisation/phytoextraction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据