4.7 Article

Rooting by Tibetan pigs diminishes carbon stocks in alpine meadows by decreasing soil moisture

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 459, 期 1-2, 页码 37-48

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-019-04270-z

关键词

Plant biomass carbon; Soil organic carbon; Microbial biomass carbon; Soil environment; Qinghai-Tibetan plateau

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that rooting by Tibetan pigs significantly reduced plant biomass carbon, soil organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon, and ecosystem carbon in alpine meadows on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Soil moisture was identified as a key factor negatively affecting carbon stocks, and decreased soil moisture also indirectly impacted microbial biomass carbon through reducing plant biomass.
Aims Carbon stocks in alpine meadows on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau are being threatened by increases in livestock herding practices. However, the extent to which current fast-growing disturbance by Tibetan pig rooting alters carbon stocks in these meadows and the underlying processes are still unclear. Methods We conducted a 3-year study in meadows with three different plant communities on the southeast Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau to explore the effects of rooting by Tibetan pigs on carbon stocks. Results Rooting by Tibetan pigs decreased plant biomass carbon (PBC), soil organic carbon (SOC), microbial biomass carbon (MBC), and ecosystem carbon (EC) by 91.25%, 30.57%, 28.94%, and 40.47%, respectively. Soil moisture (SM) was the most significant factor negatively associated with PBC, SOC, and EC. Additionally, a decreased SM by rooting also exerted an indirect effect on MBC by directly reducing plant biomass. Conclusions Rooting by Tibetan pigs diminishes carbon stocks by decreasing SM, threatening carbon stocks stored in alpine meadows. Thus, caging or reducing the breeding number of Tibetan pigs combined with restoring soil water levels would be effective ways to recover and maintain carbon stocks in alpine meadows on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据