4.3 Article

PHYTOGEOGRAPHIC CLASSIFICATION USING MULTIVARIATE APPROACH; A CASE STUDY FROM THE JAMBIL VALLEY SWAT, PAKISTAN

期刊

PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
卷 52, 期 1, 页码 279-290

出版社

PAKISTAN BOTANICAL SOC
DOI: 10.30848/PJB2020-1(11)

关键词

Floristic elements; Multivariate analysis; Phytogeography; Jambil Valley; Western Himalaya

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phytogeography is concerned with the past and present distribution of vegetation on the earth surface. The distribution of plants is neither even nor random on earth surface but follow a definite geographic pattern. The present study was aimed to find out phytogeographic pattern of plants distribution and subsequent classification of plant species of the Jambil Valley, District Swat Pakistan using multivariate statistic techniques. Sampling of vegetation was done using quadrats of 1 c 1 m(2) for herbs, 5 x 5 m(2) for shrubs and 10 x 10 m(2) for trees. The data were analyzed by PCORD v. 5 and CANOCO 4.5. The studies revealed that the vegetation of Jambil valley belongs to eighteen different phytogeographic elements. The highest percentage of elements (19.4%) belongs to Western-Himalayan region, followed by Cosmopolitan (13.9%), Eurasian (10.6%), Irano-turanian (10%), Paleotropical (9.4%), Eastern Asiatic and Mediterranean (6.7% each), Euro-Siberian (5.6%), Holoarctic (3.9%), Pantropical (3.3%), Sub-cosmopolitan (2.8%), Saharo-Arabian (2.2%), Eastern-Himalayan (1.7%), Central Asian and Neotropical (1.1% each), Pantemperate, Australian and Sudano-Zambezian (0.6% each). CANOCO correlated phytogeographical data with environmental factors, which showed significant effect of environmental variables on phytogeographical patterns. It is clear from our results that higher pH, electrical conductivity, moderate sand and silt, phosphorous and nitrogen have great impact on distribution of phytogeographical elements. The Western Himalayan elements having narrow geographic range require immediate attention and conservation efforts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据