4.5 Article

Monoclonal anti-MUC1 antibody with novel octahydropyrazino[2,1-a:5,4-a′]diisoquinoline derivative as a potential multi-targeted strategy in MCF-7 breast cancer cells

期刊

ONCOLOGY REPORTS
卷 42, 期 4, 页码 1391-1403

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/or.2019.7256

关键词

MUC1; breast cancer; apoptosis; cell cycle; combined therapy; diisoquinoline derivatives

类别

资金

  1. National Science Centre [DEC-2017/01/X/NZ7/01315]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the present study was to examine the multi-targeted potential of a monoclonal antibody against mucin-1 (MUC1) and novel octahydropyrazin[2,1-a:5,4-a ']diisoquinoline derivative (OM-86II) in estrogen receptor-positive MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. The cell viability was measured by an MTT assay. The analyses of cell cycle and disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential were performed by flow cytometry. Fluorescent microscopy and flow cytometry were used to demonstrate the effect of the compounds on apoptosis. ELISA was conducted to check the concentrations of proteins involved in multiple intracellular signaling pathways, responsible for the promotion of tumor growth and breast cancer progression, namely matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2, matrix MMP-9, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (sICAM1) and mTOR. The combination therapy based on anti-MUC1 antibody and novel OM-86II inhibited the proliferation of MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Its inhibitory effects were associated with the induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. It was demonstrated that anti-MUC1 antibody with OM-86II decreased the concentrations of MMP-2, MMP-9, sICAM1 and mTOR. In addition, the combined therapy exhibited anti-inflammatory activity, which was demonstrated by a decrease in TNF-alpha and COX-2 concentrations. The present data provided evidence that the combination of anti-MUC1 antibody with novel OM-86II represents a multi-targeted strategy in MCF-7 breast cancer treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据