4.7 Article

On pricing and quality decisions with risk aversion

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2019.102118

关键词

Risk aversion; Pricing; Quality; Expected utility theory

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [71772095]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [63192311]
  3. Hong Kong RGC GRF [16225316]
  4. Asia Research Center in Nankai University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines the impact of risk aversion on pricing and quality decisions in a firm. It is found that increasing risk aversion leads to lower optimal prices, higher optimal quality, and a simultaneous decrease in both price and quality when both are considered as decision variables. This mutual reinforcement effect between price and quality as strategic complements enhances the impacts of risk aversion on marginal profit and product price-performance.
This paper considers pricing and quality decisions for a product in a firm which is concerned about demand risk stemming from uncertainty as to customers' valuation. A stylized model is built on the basis of the expected utility theory, and the optimal solutions are characterized under very mild conditions in the scenarios of risk neutrality and risk aversion respectively. It is found that when either price or quality is the sole decision variable, the optimal price decreases with a higher level of risk aversion whereas the optimal quality increases with it. In comparison, when both price and quality are decision variables, a more risk-averse firm will set the product's price and quality at a lower level simultaneously. This is due to the mutual reinforcement effect between these two decision variables as strategic complements. This effect further enhances the impacts of risk aversion, leading to more radical changes in marginal profit and product price-performance as the risk aversion degree varies. Hence, compared to a single variable, risk aversion is a more serious issue in the presence of both the decision variables in question. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据