4.4 Article

Unsafe nursing documentation: A qualitative content analysis

期刊

NURSING ETHICS
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 1213-1224

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0969733019871682

关键词

documentation; nursing; patient safety; ethics; content analysis

资金

  1. Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Nursing documentation as a pivotal part of nursing care has many implications for patient care in terms of safety and ethics. Objectives: To explore factors influencing nursing documentation from nurses' perspectives in the Iranian nursing context. Methods: This qualitative study was carried out using a qualitative content analysis of data collected from 2018 to 2019 in two urban areas of Iran. Semi-structured interviews (n = 15), observations, and reviews of patients' medical files were used for data collection. Ethical considerations: This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of research and regulations in terms of confidentiality of data, anonymity, and provision of informed consent. Findings: The main theme of this study was unsafe documentation. Two categories, types of errors in reporting and reasons of errors in reporting, and 12 subcategories were developed indicating factors influencing nursing documentation in the Iranian nursing context. Conclusion: In general, individual, organizational, and national factors affected nursing documentation in Iran. In this respect, hiring more nurses, application of reforms in the healthcare management structure, devising appropriate regulations regarding division of labor, constant education of healthcare staff, establishment of clinical governance, improvement of interpersonal relationships, development of hardware and software techniques for documentation, and provision of support should be done to improve the quality of nursing documentation. The above-mentioned suggestions can help nurses with a safe, ethical, lawful, and reliable documentation in nursing practice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据