4.1 Article

Impact of Ice-Angling and Handling on Swimming Performance in Bluegill and Largemouth Bass

期刊

NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT
卷 39, 期 6, 页码 1301-1310

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nafm.10366

关键词

-

资金

  1. Federal Aid in Sport Fish Restoration Program from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service [F-69-R]
  2. Jonathan Baldwin Turner Scholarship via the College of Agricultural, Consumer, and Environmental Sciences at the University of Illinois
  3. Campbell Scholarship via the College of Agricultural, Consumer, and Environmental Sciences at the University of Illinois

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many recreational anglers practice catch-and-release; however, research indicates that capture and handling has the potential to adversely affect fish. Numerous catch-and-release studies have been conducted during warmer months, but little work has been done during the winter when ice-anglers in temperate regions target fish. We conducted an ice angling simulation that quantified the impacts of air temperature and air exposure duration on swimming performance and gill physiology of Bluegill Lepomis macrochirus and Largemouth Bass Micropterus salmoides. In all experiments, fish were first subjected to a simulated angling bout in water at 5 degrees C, followed by 30 s or 5 min of air exposure at above freezing (3-8 degrees C) or subfreezing (-7 degrees C) temperatures. The fish were then assessed for critical swimming speed (Bluegill), oxygen consumption (Bluegill), burst swimming (Largemouth Bass), or gill damage (Largemouth Bass). Results showed that Bluegill subjected to 5 min of air exposure at -7 degrees C suffered impaired swimming, with a 47% loss in critical swimming speed (U-crit) compared with the controls. Treatment had no impact on burst swimming or gill damage in Largemouth Bass. The results demonstrate the possible impacts of air exposure on fish, and we recommend that ice-anglers make an effort to minimize air exposure duration, especially when air temperatures are low.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据