4.6 Article

Polyploidy promotes species diversification of Allium through ecological shifts

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 225, 期 1, 页码 571-583

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.16098

关键词

Allium; diversification; ecological shifts; evolution; polyploidy; speciation rate

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1802242, 31800177]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) [FZT 118]
  3. China Scholarship Council
  4. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0505200]
  5. CAS 135 programme [2017XTBG-F01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the role of polyploidy in multiple evolutionary processes, its impact on plant diversification remains controversial. An increased polyploid frequency may facilitate speciation through shifts in ecology, morphology or both. Here we used Allium to evaluate: (1) the relationship between intraspecific polyploid frequency and species diversification rate; and (2) whether this process is associated with habitat and/or trait shifts. Using eight plastid and nuclear ribosomal markers, we built a phylogeny of 448 Allium species, representing 46% of the total. We quantified intraspecific ploidy diversity, heterogeneity in diversification rates and their relationship along the phylogeny using trait-dependent diversification models. Finally, we evaluated the association between polyploidisation and habitat or trait shifts. We detected high ploidy diversity in Allium and a polyploidy-related diversification rate shift with a probability of 95% in East Asia. Allium lineages with high polyploid frequencies had higher species diversification rates than those of diploids or lineages with lower polyploid frequencies. Shifts in speciation rates were strongly correlated with habitat shifts linked to particular soil conditions; 81.7% of edaphic variation could be explained by polyploidisation. Our study emphasises the role of intraspecific polyploid frequency combined with ecological drivers on Allium diversification, which may explain plant radiations more generally.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据