4.6 Review

The pre-analytical phase of the liquid biopsy

期刊

NEW BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 55, 期 -, 页码 19-29

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbt.2019.09.006

关键词

Pre-analytical phase; Liquid biopsy; Circulating tumor cells; Circulating nucleic acids; Exosomes

资金

  1. SPIDIA4P: SPIDIA for Personalized Medicine: Standardisation of generic pre-analytical tools and procedures for in vitro diagnostics - European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [733112]
  2. Regione Toscana, bando FAS salute 2014: OMITERC-Applicazione degli OMIcs dalla biopsia solida alla biopsia liquida per una TERapia personalizzata del Cancro [BIO16028]
  3. Italian Ministry of Health [RF2011-02352294]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The term `liquid biopsy', introduced in 2013 in reference to the analysis of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in cancer patients, was extended to cell-free nucleic acids (cfNAs) circulating in blood and other body fluids. CTCs and cfNAs are now considered diagnostic and prognostic markers, used as surrogate materials for the molecular characterisation of solid tumours, in particular for research on tumour-specific or actionable somatic mutations. Molecular characterisation of cfNAs and CTCs (especially at the single cell level) is technically challenging, requiring highly sensitive and specific methods and/or multi-step processes. The analysis of the liquid biopsy relies on a plethora of methods whose standardisation cannot be accomplished without disclosing criticisms related to the pre-analytical phase. Thus, pre-analytical factors potentially influencing downstream cellular and molecular analyses must be considered in order to translate the liquid biopsy approach into clinical practice. The present review summarises the most recent reports in this field, discussing the main pre-analytical aspects related to CTCs, cfNAs and exosomes in blood samples for liquid biopsy analysis. A short discussion on non-blood liquid biopsy samples is also included.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据