4.5 Article

Reduced adolescent risk-assessment and lower nicotinic beta-2 expression in rats exposed to nicotine through lactation by forcedly drinking dams

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 413, 期 -, 页码 64-76

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.06.014

关键词

Breast feeding; Neuro-developmental sequelae; Pre-frontal cortex; Elevated Plus Maze; Risk-assessment behaviour; Juvenile and adolescent rats

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Few animal studies focus on consequences of nicotine postnatal exposure, particularly through lactation. We have recently shown that forced nicotine drinking elevates maternal care, paradoxically provoking arousal and stress in pups. Present work aimed to evaluate the specific contribution of altered maternal cares, compared to the sequelae merely due to nicotine effects. Two groups were compared to water-drinking control dams: (i) free-choice dams (H20 + NIC group) drinking from two bottles, containing either nicotine or water; (ii) forced dams (NIC +NIC group) drinking from two bottles, both containing nicotine. We previously demonstrated that nicotine was indeed transferred to the lactating offspring. Regarding behavioural consequences at adolescence, both H20+ NIC and NIC+ NIC rats were slower than controls in discovering a novel over a familiar compartment, whilst only NIC+ NIC rats exhibited reduced risk-related avoidance and assessment behaviour. Brain analyses at adulthood suggest that, in prefrontal cortex, nicotine per se reduced serotonin, while the maternal overcare reduced CHRN-B2 gene-expression. As a whole, unescapable nicotine-enhanced maternal care could have an impact on the offspring arousal by acting on prefrontal CHRN-B2 gene-expression. When present results are translated to consequences of nonvoluntary exposure in humans, we propose that children receiving altered attentions by a smoking caregiver might undergo a neuro-behavioural development biased towards emotional shyness. (C) 2019 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据