4.5 Article

Age-related deficits in motor learning are associated with altered motor exploration strategies

期刊

NEUROSCIENCE
卷 412, 期 -, 页码 40-47

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.05.047

关键词

motor skill; ageing; variability; redundancy; UCM; PCA

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1654929, 1703735]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1703735] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  5. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1654929] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

How is motor learning affected by aging? Although several experimental paradigms have been used to address this question, there has been limited focus on the early phase of motor learning, which involvesmotor exploration and the need to coordinate multiple degrees of freedom in the body. Here, we examined motor learning in a body-machine interface where wemeasured both age-related differences in task performance as well as the coordination strategies underlying this performance. Participants (N = 65; age range 18-72 years) wore wireless inertial measurement units on the upper body, and learned to control a cursor on a screen, which was controlled bymotions of the trunk. Results showed that, consistent with prior studies, there was an age-related effect on movement time, with middle-aged and older adults taking longer to perform the task than young adults. However, we also found that these changes were associated with limited exploration in older adults. Moreover, when considering data across a majority of the lifespan (including children), longer movement times were associated with greater inefficiency of the coordination pattern, producing more task-irrelevant motion. These results suggest exploration behaviors duringmotor learning are affected with aging, and highlight the need for different practice strategies with aging. (C) 2019 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据