4.2 Article

Development of an academic disease registry for spinal muscular atrophy

期刊

NEUROMUSCULAR DISORDERS
卷 29, 期 10, 页码 794-799

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nmd.2019.08.014

关键词

Disease registry; Spinal muscular atrophy; Neuromuscular disorders

资金

  1. Italian Telethon
  2. SMA Foundation
  3. Cure SMA
  4. National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust and University College London
  5. The MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases Biobank
  6. MDUK
  7. SMA Trust
  8. Biogen
  9. Famiglie SMA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the development of a new disease registry on SMA as the result of a collaboration among three national networks in United States, Italy, and United Kingdom in partnership with a biotechnology company and with the support of advocacy groups. The aim of establishing a large collaborative registry within academic centers was to establish a structured but flexible system for collection of prospective, highly curated data that will deeply phenotype all patients with SMA and follow them longitudinally over several years. This paper describes the process leading to the development of the registry including the identification of the relevant data elements, the design of an electronic CRF with a shared data dictionary, the piloting of the first version and the definition of the final version. The registry will provide a central structure for conducting academic studies based on a much larger cohort of patients than those available in the individual networks. Due to the quality control of the data collected the registry can also be used for postmarketing purposes, allowing to share, in a transparent and controlled way, real-world data with pharmaceutical partners, drug regulatory agencies, and advocacy groups for better understanding of safety and effectiveness of new treatments. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据