4.8 Article

Autophagy promotes ferroptosis by degradation of ferritin

期刊

AUTOPHAGY
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 1425-1428

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1187366

关键词

autophagy; ferroptosis; ferritinophagy; ferritin; iron; lipid; NCOA4; pancreatic cancer

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health of the USA [R01GM115366, R01CA160417, R01 CA181450]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31171229, U1132005]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong [2016A030308]
  4. Science of Guangzhou Key Project [201508020258, 201400000003-4, 201400000004-4]
  5. Research Scholar Grant from the American Cancer Society [RSG-16-014-01-CDD]
  6. [P30CA047904]
  7. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA160417, P30CA047904] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R01GM115366] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Macroautophagy/autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved degradation pathway that maintains homeostasis. Ferroptosis, a novel form of regulated cell death, is characterized by a production of reactive oxygen species from accumulated iron and lipid peroxidation. However, the relationship between autophagy and ferroptosis at the genetic level remains unclear. Here, we demonstrated that autophagy contributes to ferroptosis by degradation of ferritin in fibroblasts and cancer cells. Knockout or knockdown of Atg5 (autophagy-related 5) and Atg7 limited erastin-induced ferroptosis with decreased intracellular ferrous iron levels, and lipid peroxidation. Remarkably, NCOA4 (nuclear receptor coactivator 4) was a selective cargo receptor for the selective autophagic turnover of ferritin (namely ferritinophagy) in ferroptosis. Consistently, genetic inhibition of NCOA4 inhibited ferritin degradation and suppressed ferroptosis. In contrast, overexpression of NCOA4 increased ferritin degradation and promoted ferroptosis. These findings provide novel insight into the interplay between autophagy and regulated cell death.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据