4.5 Article

Modified ketogenic diet is associated with improved cerebrospinal fluid biomarker profile, cerebral perfusion, and cerebral ketone body uptake in older adults at risk for Alzheimer's disease: a pilot study

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 86, 期 -, 页码 54-63

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.09.015

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Mild cognitive impairment; Ketogenic diet; CSF biomarkers; MRI; PET

资金

  1. Wake Forest Alzheimer's Disease Research Center [P30-AG049638]
  2. Hartman Family Foundation
  3. Roena B. Kulynych Center for Memory and Cognition Research
  4. Swedish Research Council
  5. Swedish State Support for Clinical Research (ALFGBG)
  6. MRC [UKDRI-1003] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is currently no established therapy to treat or prevent Alzheimer's disease. The ketogenic diet supplies an alternative cerebral metabolic fuel, with potential neuroprotective effects. Our goal was to compare the effects of a modified Mediterranean-ketogenic diet (MMKD) and an American Heart Association Diet (AHAD) on cerebrospinal fluid Alzheimer's biomarkers, neuroimaging measures, peripheral metabolism, and cognition in older adults at risk for Alzheimer's. Twenty participants with subjective memory complaints (n = 11) or mild cognitive impairment (n = 9) completed both diets, with 3 participants discontinuing early. Mean compliance rates were 90% for MMKD and 95% for AHAD. All participants had improved metabolic indices following MMKD. MMKD was associated with increased cerebrospinal fluid A beta 42 and decreased tau. There was increased cerebral perfusion and increased cerebral ketone body uptake (C-11-acetoacetate PET, in subsample) following MMKD. Memory performance improved after both diets, which may be due to practice effects. Our results suggest that a ketogenic intervention targeted toward adults at risk for Alzheimer's may prove beneficial in the prevention of cognitive decline. (C) 2019 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据